Chapter 3 — Real-Results Sourcing

Prompt 9 Matching & Scoring

Every vacancy scored on skills, salary, location, growth, competition, and effort, with your dealbreakers as hard filters and a reason attached to every score.

Context/Tips
  • Inputs: `[AGENT:VACANCY_LIST_RAW]`, `[AGENT:CV_PROFILE]`, `[AGENT:SEARCH_CRITERIA_STRUCTURED]`, `[AGENT:APPLICANT_COUNT]`, `[USER:DEALBREAKERS]`
  • Outputs: `[AGENT:VACANCY_MATCH_SCORES]`
  • Checkpoint: Yes — review shortlist tiers.
  • Quality gate: Dealbreakers applied as hard filters; every score has a reason.
  • Suggested agents: Agent 12; optionally Agent 13 if verification is folded into scoring.
  • Manual use: Paste P9 with Steps 2, 5, 7, 8 outputs.
Expected Outcome

`[AGENT:VACANCY_MATCH_SCORES]` Checkpoint: Yes — review shortlist tiers.

The Prompt
Score each vacancy in [AGENT:VACANCY_LIST_RAW] using [AGENT:CV_PROFILE], [AGENT:SEARCH_CRITERIA_STRUCTURED], [AGENT:APPLICANT_COUNT], and [USER:DEALBREAKERS]. Score on skills fit, seniority fit, salary fit, location fit, culture fit, growth fit, competition level, and application effort. Apply dealbreakers as hard filters. Rank and group into strong, medium, and weak tiers as [AGENT:VACANCY_MATCH_SCORES]. Every vacancy in the output must appear with its direct posting URL and its direct-application end-link inline — never present a vacancy without its links. Do not rank on gut feeling. Do not ignore dealbreakers. Do not ignore language, location, or work authorization. Do not hide low-scoring vacancies without explaining why.